figure 1: A Power Station.
Voltage stability is concerned with the ability of a power system to maintain acceptable voltages at all buses in the system under normal conditions and after being subjected to a disturbance. It is an important consideration in the design and operation of power systems. In this lab, you will learn the basic concepts of voltage stability and associated assessment methods. Case studies will be performed to understand the P-V and Q-V characteristics of a power system under different circumstances. Through this lab, you will gain an understanding on the various limiting factors that affect the capability of a power transmission system to transport power to loads.
Task 1 - Create P-V Curves - Base Case
Starting with the original system the P-V curves for each load bus will be determined. To do so both the real and reactive power load demand will be proportionally scaled up in increments while the total system load and the bus voltages are recorded. At some point the load will become too great for the system and the system will go into Blackout at its limit.
Task 2 - New Transmission Line
The base case will be modified by placing an identical parallel transmission line between two of the buses in order to decrease the impedance between the two buses. The P-V curves of this case and the base case will be compared to demonstrate the effect of the new parallel transmission lines effect on the systems performance.
Task 3 - Limiting Reactive Power Capacity
The base case will again be modified to include a reactive power output limit on the generator at bus 2 which the generator will hit during the experiment. The P-V curves of this case and the base case will be compared to demonstrate the effect this limit on the systems performance.
Task 4 - Impact of Shunt Capacitor
This case will use the previous case as its starting point and also disconnect the shunt compensation capacitor on bus 4 which will increase the reactive power needed to be supplied by the generators. The P-V curves of this case and the other cases will be compared to demonstrate the effect removing the shunt compensation capacitor has on the systems performance.
Task 5 - Create Q-V Curves
Starting from the Base Case we are going to determine the Q-V curve at bus 9 using 2 different approaches so they can be compared. The first approach is to attach a temporary generator as a synchronous condenser to the bus under test to control its voltage and then measure the reactive power consumed by the generator. In the second approach the reactive power is increased using a reactive load on the bus under test and measuring the resulting bus voltage. ***
Voltage stability is also called the load stability. It is a characteristic of a power system that is required to transmit sufficient power to meet load demand. The voltage stability is the ability of the system to maintain acceptable voltage at all buses in the system under normal and abnormal operating conditions. A power transmission network has an inherent limit as to how much power it can deliver to loads. When this limit is exceeded, the voltages experienced by loads become too low to be practically useful. In many cases, the voltages will go straight from normal to zero in a matter of a few seconds or minutes. This process is called voltage collapse. Massive voltage collapses across several interconnected power systems are not unusual. For example, at the summer of 1996, two voltage collapses occurred in the west coast Canada- US-Mexico interconnected system, causing blackouts for millions of customers.
The capability of a transmission network can be loosely visualized as the size of a pipe or the number of parallel pipes. The power transfer capability of this system would be affected if one or more pipes (transmission lines) are lost. Loss of transmission lines or other supporting components such as shunt capacitors will cause the reduction of system capability. When system capability is reduced, loads have to be shed. Otherwise the demand and supply cannot match and voltage collapse will occur.
The simplest form of voltage stability assessment involves the determination and characterization of a network’s power transfer capability. This capability must be greater than the anticipated load. The network
capability will change if some of its components are not available due to failure or maintenance. The capability assessment therefore needs to be conducted for a number of contingency scenarios for planning and managing the system. P-V and Q-V curves are two most commonly used techniques to assess the capability of a network. These curves show the voltages of selected buses as functions of increased system load. The “nose points” of these curves are the system limit.
figure 2. A typical P-V curve.
figure 3. A typical Q-V curve.
In this lab, voltage stability analysis is just limited to the assessment of system capability using P-V and Q-V methods. The capability will be determined for various operating scenarios. The results will help you to understand what are the impact factors that affect network transfer capability and hence the voltage stability of a system.
The P-V curve method is a process to determine the P-V curves of a network. While there are many advanced and automated methods to determine the curves, the following procedure is sufficient to determine simple P-V curves of a network:
Develop a load flow base case. The case, reflecting existing system loading and operating conditions, must be solved successfully by your load flow program (The PowerWorld Simulator).
All loads (both real and reactive power parts) in the system are scaled to a new level. The generator output may also need to be scaled. In this lab, generation scaling is not performed to simplify the process. Thus, the power mismatch is supplied by the slack generators. Record the new total load level, as P1 (the real power part).
The case is solved by using the load flow function again. If the case solves, record the voltages of key buses (called monitored buses) as VA1, VB1 … etc. If the case cannot be solved or diverges, go to step 6.
Save the solved case. Scale up the loads again on the basis of this solved case and solve it. If it solves, record the results as P2, and VA2, VB2 … etc.
Steps 2 to 4 are repeated until the case cannot be solved, i.e. the solution of load flow diverges.
If the load flow diverges, it typically means that the limit (nose-point) has been reached. The P-V curve process is now completed. The results, recorded P and V data points, can be plotted as P-V curves.
It is important to note the following points:
The amount of load increase should be gradually decreasing as one approaches the nose point. Namely, the incremental P becomes smaller and smaller. The purpose is to help one to zero in the nose point more accurately.
When solution diverges, don’t record the results. The output results are not correct.
The P-V curve plots V against P, although the system Q has also been changed in proportion to P. The exact name for P-V curve should therefore be the SV curve. However, the terminology of P-V curve has been accepted in industry. P-V curve does not mean to increase P only.
The Q-V curve method is a process to determine the Q-V curves of a network. A Q-V curve represents the system voltage behavior when increased reactive power is withdrawn from a bus called test bus. This is done by connecting a synchronous condenser (a generator with zero active power) to the test bus. The voltage setting of the condenser is decreased gradually, resulting increased withdrawal of reactive power from the network. There is a limit for the amount of reactive power that can be withdrawn. This limit is the nose point. The process of obtaining a Q-V curve is as follows:
Develop a solved load flow base case.
Select the test bus. Test bus is typically an important bus in the network. The need to select a test bus is one of the main drawbacks of the Q-V method. Record the test bus voltage.
Add a synchronous condenser to the test bus. A condenser has a zero P output. The voltage setting of the condenser is equal to the test bus voltage recorded in step 2.
Run the load flow. The case should be easily solved. Examine the output of the condenser. It should be zero for both P and Q. Save the case.
Decrease the voltage setting of the condenser by a small amount, say, 0.03pu. Run the load flow case. If the case is solved, record the Q output from the condenser. The output should be negative, indicating Q withdrawal from the system. Save the case.
If the case can not be solved, stop. Otherwise, repeat Step 5.
The above process will result in a series of data points (V1, Q1), ... (Vn, Qn). Plot of the Q data versus V data is the Q-V curve. In the Q-V curve method, one only records and charts the voltage and reactive power output of the test bus.
Please complete the following before attending your scheduled lab session.
Make sure you know where and when to come to the lab by looking at the lab schedule that is available on eClass.
Familiarize yourself with the lab procedures and requirements by reading through the lab manual.
Complete the questions from the ECE433 - Lab 3 - Prelab Questions template. The same questions are shown below.
Have at least, the ECE433 - Lab 3 – Sign-off sheet printed off before coming to the lab.
The ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet will be used to record your results for analysis and submission.
Note that there is a ECE433 - Lab 3 - Postlab Question template for you to complete as part of your postlab. The same question are shown inline in the lab manual at the appropriate place.
What is voltage stability? How does voltage instability manifest in a power system?
What are the main objectives of stability analysis?
Give the definitions of P-V curve and Q-V curve. Why there is a "nose point" in these curves?
List at least four compensating devices or methods that can be used to maintain or to increase system voltage stability. Explain the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Plot qualitative P-V curves (in one chart) for the following cases:
If a shunt capacitor is switched off in an industry plant, what could happen to the bus voltages? Use P-V curve to explain your answer.
State the advantages and disadvantages of the Q-V curve method.
If the reactive power output from a generator reaches its limit, will the generator help voltage stability? Explain why.
The system for this lab is the same as the one that was used in the previous lab titled Lab 2: Power Flow Calculations. You will experiment with this system focusing on a few voltage stability analysis tasks. You can download the base case below as a starting point for this lab.
figure 4. A balanced industrial system.
The simulator has a tool to that allows you to easily scale multiple
elements in the system by selecting the buses that the element is
attached to. An element can be a load, a bus shunt, or a generator that
is connected to one of the buses. The tools dialog box is shown below.
To open the scaling tool, under the Tools
ribbon select
Scale Case
in the Other Tools
ribbon
group.
figure 5. The Scale Case tool.
The tool allows you to scale multiple objects proportionally by selecting the connected buses and entering the desired scaling value. You can either select buses directly or by there assigned Area, Zone, Super Area, Owner or Injection Group. We will be selecting the buses to scale directly.
For the lab, We want to increase the combined system load by scaling
all of the selected buses proportionally to achieve the desired loading
result. As we increase the loading on the system the voltages on the
buses will decrease until they are unable to supply the power to the
load and the system goes into a BLACKOUT
. We do not scale
up the generation in order to simplify the procedure. Follow this
procedure when required to scale the buses.
Start by making sure the Bus
and Buses
tabs are selected. In the Buses
area, the buses of the
system are all listed and will initially all be set to NO
meaing that they will not be scaled For this lab we want to scale all of
the load buses, therefore we can change buses 4, 6, 8 and 9 to
YES
to indicate they are the ones we want to
scale.
The total load of the selected buses will now be shown in the
Original Value
box under the Bus Load
heading.
The original load should initially be 9.99 MW and 8.46 Mvar.
Make sure the checkboxes at the bottom of the page are setup as follows:
figure 6. Scale Case checkboxes.
To scale the selected buses the software allows you to do this in
2 ways: Either place a multiplier in the Scale Factor
box
to obtain new load values for each selected bus based on that
multiplier, or place a new total load value for all selected buses in
the New Value
box and the software will calculate how much
it should add to each bus. Note that when I enter a value into one of
the boxes the other value is calculated automatically once I hit
Enter
. Also note that the Q values also get scaled
accordingly as we have the Constant P/Q Ratio
checkbox
selected. The scaling of the system will not happen until the
Do Scaling
button is pressed at the bottom of the
page.
To make our simulations go a little more smoothly we can change a
couple of the Simulator Options
under the
Tools
ribbon.
Under
Power Flow Solution/Advanced Options/Power Flow (Inner) Loop Options
Set the Minimum Per Unit Voltage for/Constant Power Loads
to 0.00
. This will ensure that simulation will run until
the system goes to Blackout
instead of stopping when one of
the buses reaches this value.
Just above the last setting also make sure to un-check the item
Initialize from Flat Start Values
. This allows the system
to automatically re-start the simulation from known values once the
system goes into Blackout
.
figure 7. Simulation Options.
In this case, in order to determine the P-V curves for each load bus,
both the real and reactive power load demand will be scaled up in
increments until the system goes into Blackout
. This is
done one power step at a time using the Scale Case
tool
which is described in the How to Scale a Case
section at
the beginning of the lab procedure.
Solve the Base Case
to determine the initial
per-unit voltages of all of the load buses (Bus 4, Bus 6, Bus 8 and Bus
9) at the initial system load demand. Record these values in the
appropriate table on the
ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
.
Use the Scale Case
tool to increase the total load
demand (both active power and reactive power) by proportionally
increasing the load at each one of the buses so the total active power
matches the required values in the table below. Determine the per-unit
voltages of all of the load buses (Bus 4, Bus 6, Bus 8 and Bus 9) at
each power setting and record these values in the corresponding table on
the ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
. Note that every time you
Do Scaling
you need to find the new solution by either
clicking on the Solve Power Flow - Newton
button or by
continuously running the solution by clicking on the Play
button in the Tools
ribbon.
P (MW) | Bus 4 | Bus 6 | Bus 8 | Bus 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|
9.99 | ||||
20 | ||||
30 | ||||
40 | ||||
50 | ||||
60 | ||||
70 | ||||
? | ||||
80 | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT |
ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
.figure 8. BLACKOUT!!! popup.
Get a lab instructor or TA to check your results so far to see if you are on the right track, if everything is alright they will sign your sign-off sheet.
Q1. Why software should initialize from flat start for this study?
Q2. The P-V curves can be plotted for different buses. Do all curves have the same nose point? Why?
Q3. If only active power is scaled up in the process, one can get another set of 'P-V' curves. Draw qualitatively (no simulation is needed, draw based on your theoretical expectation) the following two curves in one chart and explain the difference: the first curve is the standard P-V curve, and the second curve is the P-V curve with only P scaled up. Please remember that you have to find more scaling factors for active power by trial and error until the case diverges.
In this section, starting with the base case, a second identical transmission line is added in parallel to the transmission line of branch 4. This changes the total impedance of branch 4 to be half of the original. The P-V curves will also be determined for this new case to compare to the previous case.
Per Unit Impedance Parameters
are set to be equal to
the existing transmission line. After making the required modification
to the base case and solving it, save the new case with an appropriate
name.figure 9. An added second parallel transmission line.
ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
.P (MW) | Bus 4 | Bus 6 | Bus 8 | Bus 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|
9.99 | ||||
20 | ||||
30 | ||||
40 | ||||
50 | ||||
60 | ||||
70 | ||||
? | ||||
80 | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT |
Q4. What is impact of adding a parallel line to the system P-V curve?
Q5. Why does adding a parallel line mean the line impedance is halved? If a line has a shunt admittance (the shunt branch of the common PI circuit for a line), what is the impact of adding a line on the admittance?
Q6. Are there other methods to reduce the line series impedance? (Name at least one)
In this section, again starting with the base case, a reactive power output limit is going to be placed on the generator at bus 2 to demonstrate what the effect is. This would be a typical limitation of a actual generator. The P-V curves will also be determined for this new case to compare to the previous cases.
Before starting this task open the Simulation Options
to
verify that the reactive power limit of the generator will be taken into
consideration by the Simulator. To do this make sure that the
Disable Checking Gen VAR Limits
is unchecked as shown
below.
figure 10. Simulator Options.
Max Mvar
setting of the generator at bus 2 to 46.8 MVar as shown below. After
making the required modification to the base case and solving it, save
the new case with an appropriate name.figure 11. Setting the generators maximum reactive power.
ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
.P (MW) | Bus 4 | Bus 6 | Bus 8 | Bus 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|
9.99 | ||||
20 | ||||
30 | ||||
40 | ||||
50 | ||||
? | ||||
60 | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT |
Q7. Are there any differences in system voltages between the new base case of this study and the base case used in Task 1? Why?
Q8. What is the impact of generator Q limit on system capability? Explain.
Q9. Why does a generator have a limit for reactive power output (think your EE332 course)?
In this section, this time starting with the case from the previous Limiting Reactive Power Capacity section, the shunt capacitor at bus 4 is going to be turned off to demonstrate what the effect is. The P-V curves will also be determined for this new case to compare to the previous cases.
Double check that the reactive power Limit of the generator will be taken into consideration.
figure 12. Disconnecting the shunt compensation capacitor.
ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
.P (MW) | Bus 4 | Bus 6 | Bus 8 | Bus 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|
10 | ||||
20 | ||||
30 | ||||
40 | ||||
50 | ||||
? | ||||
60 | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT | BLACKOUT |
Once you are satisfied that you have collected all of the information required for the P-V curves for your lab report get a lab instructor or TA to check your results and if everything is alright they will sign your sign-off sheet.
Q10. Are there any differences in system voltages between the new base case of this study and the base case used in Task 3? Why?
Q11. What is the impact of disconnecting the capacitor on the reactive power output of the generator? Explain.
Q12. What is the impact of disconnecting the capacitor on the system capability? (i.e. P-V curve limit) Explain.
Q13. If the generator has no reactive power output limit in this case, what can happen to the P-V curve? Draw qualitative P-V curves for the following cases: 1) case of Task 3, 2) case of Task 4 and 3) case of Task 4 but there is no reactive power limit for the co-generator.
Q14. Discuss the differences of the P-V curves for Bus 4.
In this section, starting with the base case again, we are going to determine the Q-V curve at bus 9 using 2 different approaches so they can be compared.
Use a fictitious synchronous condenser on bus 9 as it can be used to control the bus voltage by consuming or generating reactive power on that bus. In our case as we slowly decrease the synchronous condenser set-point voltage, which in turn also sets the bus voltage, it will result in an increase in the amount of reactive power consumed by the synchronous condenser. The reactive power and voltage of the synchronous condenser can then be plotted to produce a Q-V curve. See the Background section for more information.
figure 13. Adding a synchronous condenser.
The generator setting should be set to the following:
figure 14. Initial synchronous condenser settings.
Solve the case and notice that when the generator is set to the
initial voltage it has negligible effect on the system. Record the
reactive power consumed by the generator in the appropriate place in the
table on the ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
.
Change the Setpoint Voltage
of the generator on bus
9 to the per-unit voltage levels listed in the table below for Approach
1. Determine the reactive power consumed by the generator at each
voltage setting and record these values in the corresponding table on
the ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
. Note that every time you
change the SetPoint Voltage
you need to find the new
solution by either clicking on the
Solve Power Flow - Newton
button or by continuously running
the solution by clicking on the Play
button in the
Tools
ribbon.
V (pu) | Q (Mvar) | Q (Mvar ) | V (pu) |
---|---|---|---|
V_init: 0.98995 | Q_init: 1.04013 | ||
0.9 | 50 | ||
0.8 | 100 | ||
0.7 | 150 | ||
0.65 | 160 | ||
0.625 | 170 | ||
0.6 | 180 | ||
0.575 | 181 | ||
0.56 | 182 | BLACKOUT | |
0.555 | – | – | |
0.55 | BLACKOUT | – | – |
Gradually scale up only the reactive power load on only bus 9 using a similar procedure as in the previous “P-V Curve” sections. As the reactive power load on bus 9 increases the voltage of the bus will decrease. The voltage at the bus and reactive power consumed by the load can then be plotted to produce a Q-V curve.
Scale Case
tool as
was done before. If you use the Scale Case
tool make sure
to only select bus 9 to scale. Determine the per-unit voltage at bus 9
at each reactive power setting listed in the table in the previous
section under Approach 2 and record these values in the corresponding
table on the ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
.Once you are satisfied that you have collected all of the information required for your lab report get a lab instructor or TA to check your restults and if everything is alright they will sign your sign-off sheet.
Q15. Is there any difference between the two Q-V curves created using the 2 different approaches? Explain.
Q16. Why is the initial Setpoint Voltage
for the
fictitious condenser used in approach 1 set to the bus voltage of the
original base case?
Q17. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to obtaining a Q-V curve.
Submit the following on eClass using the
Submit (Lab 3 - Results)
link before the postlab due date.
Every student needs to hand-in their own results. Please merge all the
following into a single pdf document in the following order:
Use a scanned/picture copy of the
ECE433 - Lab 3 - Sign-off
sheet as your cover sheet
coverted to pdf. Make sure your name, student ID, CCID and lab section
are visible in the table at the top of the page and make sure that you
have obtained the required signatures from your lab instructor or TA
during your lab session.
A pdf of the completed results tables and plots from the
ECE433 - Lab 3 - Spreadsheet
.
A pdf of the Answers to the Questions on the
ECE433 - Lab 3 - Postlab Questions
sheet.
PDFsam Basic is a free and open source software that can be used for the pdf merge: https://pdfsam.org/download-pdfsam-basic/